Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Alleged Manifesto of Joseph Andrew Stack

After hearing word that Joseph Andrew Stack apparently crashed his private plane into the IRS offices of the Echelon III in Austin, TX, I learned that he had allegedly penned a manifesto. What follows is the manifesto without comment. My goal in coming posts is to extrapolate any salient points that may be used to help understand how a monetary system causes this particular class of problems. To be clear, I in no way advocate violence, terrorism or other forms of expression that harm and threaten others. It is my general belief that the biosocial pressures that are promulgated by the effects of real or artificial scarcity and our feeble attempts at reconciling needs, desires and resources have a negative impact on the human conscience and well being.

If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer… and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.

Note:

· “another person” is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

· “taxpayer” is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

· “individual”, “employee”, or “worker” is you.

Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)

02/18/2010

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The End Is Here

As I witness the myriad grotesqueries inflicted upon my fellow man, I see a common thread that binds them all to the same failing structure.

The profit motive is seen by many to be the only real way to get a person to “contribute to society.”  We find it easy to classify people into “bums” and “pillars of society” based on how much economic value they generate for themselves and others. In fact, incredible wealth is something that we are told to aspire to, to seek out and hold on tight to the reigns of financial success, even at the cost of personal happiness and even long term health. We tell our children that they can one day be among the wealthiest of the population, that all they have to do is work hard and be educated. And even if they don’t make it to the stature of a Bill Gates or Warren Buffet, they can still live out their lives in comfort and prosperity.

No on ever really explains to children that their happiness and prosperity comes at the price of untold suffering and death of many people out of our collective sight. Very rarely do they learn of the abject horrors inflicted on people domestically and abroad that allow them to aspire and attain these financial goals. Of course, who wants to be the one to admit to little Johnny that his dreams of becoming a millionaire require him to be ignorant of or indifferent to the suffocating facts of slavery and subjugation of millions if not billions of others. And if this is something that parents don’t understand, then the honest and well meaning transmittal of these goals to the child often do not carry with it the necessary understandings and truths that these hopes rest upon.

Very often instead, we subvert our own premises with this idea of religion. Sure, you should go make lots of money, but don’t forget that there is a god that is scrutinizing you, to whom you should pay respect, favor and tithes. Also, this god may or may not have very specific yet somehow vague rules that should never be violated, unless we are in a region or culture that conveniently ignores and/or re-interprets that rule in a different way, especially if that rule gets in the way of our enjoyment/peace of mind/ability to make money or any other arbitrary reason that we see fit to make exemptions for. Also, our particular view of religion is the only right one, and you’ll burn in hell if you don’t follow it. But we love you no matter what. Unless we don’t. But god still does! Unless you’ve done something very very bad. Which is still open to interpretation. The point is, you should claim to believe what we tell you because it helps you make money. And go to paradise/heaven/nirvana when you die. But dying is bad, so try not to do that. But other people dying is ok, as long as they’re poor and unimportant. Especially if they don’t believe like we do. And they more than likely don’t, because god would have saved them if he wanted to. But he didn’t, so you don’t have to worry about it. Just pay some extra tithes to make you feel better. You’ll get 10 times the investment back. Trust us. Oh yeah, god says to care about other people. Try and do that.

It’s kind of confusing to a person to hold in their head the idea that they should get money at all costs, and to care about other people as much as you care about yourself. It becomes a billion times more confusing when the underpinnings of money and the inherent suffering and fraud that it perpetuates are not understood. A person can very easily turn to any number of destructive behaviors as a response to such fundamentally different and antithetical ideas trying to live in one person’s head. It no longer shocks me to see people willfully allow themselves and their children to descend into a hellish place in their life where there appears to be no escape. No amount of prayer or money or good intentions will ever overcome a basic understanding of the truth and its power to illuminate the darkest corners of reality. No person can ever be healthy living in this world given such diametrically opposed views and no context in which to view them. This is why I believe that the profit motive is the most inherently destructive motive in the history of mankind.

Continued in future posts.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

ZDay 2010

There is a movement, the Zeitgeist Movement, that promotes the shifting of society to a resource based economy that values life and utilizes technology and the scientific method to provide abundantly for all people of the world.

In the middle of March, there is a concerted effort to reach out to the community and provide information, education and opportunities to learn more about the Venus Project, the virtues of a new approach to society and the possibilities of a truly unleashed human effort.

This day is called ZDay, and you can help with these efforts by organizing, attending or just thinking about the issues that are raised and the visions of the future that can be attained when a holistic and intelligent mode of thought and action is engendered in a society and the world at large.

Monday, December 28, 2009

A Simple Hope

I hope that when people learn of the great many things that have been taken from them, essentially stolen by a multitude of perpetuated, overlapping and interconnected lies, that they are able to respond constructively to the situation, and not be tempted by the constantly reinforced motives of revenge, anger or destruction.

Learning, however, is not something people are trained to do. They are brought up to be instructed by institutions, guided by authority that has usurped the power of truth by afflicting the minds of the people with lies. People will defend these lies to no end, because they have essentially known nothing else. They are also afraid to be wrong, because they have associated being wrong and making mistakes with failure, which meets with strong negative social reinforcement and stigma. Essentially, many people are not only unable, but unwilling to understand the truth.

As evidenced below, people will confront simple truth with complex lies. We must forgive them however, because they know not what they do.

All we can do is be patient, be truthful and to never surrender our hope.

Stateless society: A beautiful deception

Those that have argued in the past for moving toward a stateless society start by centralizing the resources. The process of cataloging and optimizing is never done, so the stated goal of eliminating the state is replaced with a perpetual tyranny. The beauty of freedom from the state is ephemeral.

Freud said that the man's id is with him always and is not something that can be removed from the man. The concept of a stateless society requires the human id not lead our actions. Without a great deal of selflessness among all persons no society can do without law enforcement. The attractiveness of the no-laws society is a fraud.

Some that argue for the stateless society say that we should give away everything needed for life. Most people know that if we offer to give more things away for free there will be less to go around overall. The benevolence that comes from munificence eventually leads to degradation of the very same munificence.  The charity required to support a stateless society is self-destructive to that society. The lovely concept of patronage free charity is dishonest.

The market system works and if people do not accept the market system then there will be death, chaos, destruction, social regression and eventually a return to feudalism. Scientific management of resources has been tried time and again, and accepting it leads to a return to the mercantile system. It is simple wishful thinking to desire a functional stateless system based on mutual consent in resource allocation.  The imaginative concept of governance of all resources by mutual scientifically informed consent along is intellectually deceitful.

There are many examples of those who have worked and learned and turned their lives around. Without the bitter of pain, the sweetness of success has no meaning. Without the ability to fail, to some extent, in life, there is less impetus to strive to innovate. The market is about innovation, overcoming adversity, creating new efficiencies and progressing society forward. Third world countries that do not protect the valuable and fragile resource of a free and open market stagnate and fester. Innovation that comes from altruism has never come close the innovation that comes from a profit motive. The charming concept of a stateless society with no profit motive is a ruse.

States must exist to protect the sanctity of the market. Everyone is part of this market every day, this is not an intrinsically immoral act. The use of the state to protect a free and open market is highly correlated, among the many nation-states that do so, with an improved quality of life. The state tends to be inefficient and institutions are filled with flawed humans and bad practices. Despite this the profit motive has allowed the market economy, as well regulated by the state, to bring about the very best in human ingenuity and creativity. The stateless society is a beautiful deception.